Ulbricht to be Sentenced Friday

PreetWhile the world waits to see what might happen to the Ulbricht case over the likely next decade and a half it spends traversing appellate courts, Ulbricht must first pass the formality of sentencing after the show trial staged for him by Preet Bharara. Ulbricht won't be sentenced until this Friday, May 29th but the prosecution's continued shenanigans began a new nearly a month ago when Bharara's team introduced six overdose deaths they would like to pin on Ulbricht, but apparently weren't confident enough to present at trial in a manner reminiscent of that time they forgot to mention they were getting ready to arrest a number of Federal agents who investigated Ulbricht.

Further last week Judge Forrest requested that the Government provide her with a "clone" of the Silk Road server or failing that whatever information the government has on bulk sales on the Silk Road as well as information concerning commerce in a number of drug precursors. Forrest also requested that either party to the case provide her with two publications.12

In Judge Forrest's courtroom3 Ulbricht faces a minimum sentence of twenty years of incarceration and a variety of possible maximum sentences which would all keep Ulbricht incarcerated until such time his body can no longer sustain life. A win down the road in an appellate court is the only legal way Ulbricht can avoid spending at least 20 years in prison.

Below is the full text of the letter sent by Ulbricht to Judge Forrest in advance of his sentencing:

Dear Judge Forrest,

I am writing you this letter in anticipation of my upcoming sentencing. This is a challenging letter to write because, as one who faces punishment, I have a strong incentive to say anything I think might result in leniency. But I have endeavored to be honest and forthright throughout this process, and so I will be in this letter as well.

My incarceration for the past year and half has given me a lot of time to reflect on the actions I took which led to my arrest and conviction, and my motivations for those actions. When I created and began to work on Silk Road I wasn't seeking financial gain. I was, in fact, in fairly good financial shape at the time. I was the head of a startup company, Good Wagon Books, that was growing and had potential. I held two degrees that could land me an excellent job I could fall back on should the company fail. I created Silk Road because I thought the idea for the website itself had value, and that bringing Silk Road into being was the right thing to do. I believed at the time that people should have the right to buy and sell whatever they wanted so long as they weren't hurting anyone else. However, I've learned since then that taking immediate actions on one's beliefs, without taking the necessary time to really think them through, can have disastrous consequences. Silk Road turned out to be a very naive and costly idea that I deeply regret.

Silk Road was supposed to be about giving people the freedom to make their own choices, to pursue their own happiness, however they individually saw What it turned into was, in part, a convenient way for people to satisfy their drug addictions. I do not and never have advocated the abuse of drugs. I learned from Silk Road that when you give people freedom, you don't know what they'll do with it. While I still don't think people should be denied the right to make this decision for themselves, I never sought to create a site that would provide another avenue for people to feed their addictions. Had I been more mature, or more patient, or even more then, I would have done things differently.

I was naive in other ways as well. Before this case, I had never been arrested, let alone jailed. Imprisonment was an abstract concept for me. I knew it was undesirable, but I didn't have a firm grasp on What it would actually be like. I have now learned that the absolute worst aspect is separation from my family and loved ones and the grief it has caused them. If I had realized the impact my creation of Silk Road would ultimately have on the people I care about most, I never would have created Silk Road. I created it for what I believed at the time to be selfless reasons, but in the end it turned out to be a very selfish thing to do.

In creating Silk Road, I ruined my life and destroyed my future. I squandered the enviable upbringing my family provided me, all of the opportunities I have been given, and the ones I have earned, and my talents. I could have done so much more with my life. I see that now, but it is too late. You are charged with sentencing me to at least 20 years. In 20 years I could have made a positive contribution to society, without breaking the law. In 20 years I could have raised a family, and celebrated countless milestones in the lives of my friends, parents and siblings. I tell you these things because I want you to know that while I miss the comforts and joys of freedom, the most painful loss is the loss of my ability to support the people I care about and to be a daily part of their lives, and to be a productive member of society. For these reasons, if you find that my conviction warrants a sentence that allows for my eventual release, I will not lose my love for humanity during my years of imprisonment, and upon my release I will do what I can to make up for not being there for the people I love, and to make the world a better place, but within the limits of the law.

As I see it, a life sentence is more similar in nature to a death sentence than it is to a sentence with a finite number of years. Both condemn you to die in prison, a life sentence just takes longer. If I do make it out of prison, decades from now, I won?t be the same man, and the world won?t be the same place. I certainly won't be the rebellious risk taker I was when I created Silk Road. In fact, I'll be an old man, at least 50, with the additional wear and tear prison life brings. I will know firsthand the heavy price of breaking the law and will know better than anyone that it is not worth it. Even now I understand what a terrible mistake I made. I 've had my youth, and I know you must take away my middle years, but please leave me my old age. Please leave a small light at the end of the tunnel, an excuse to stay healthy, an excuse to dream of better days ahead, and a chance to redeem myself in the free world before I meet my maker.



035 Ulbricht

  1. Martin, J. (2014). Drugs on the Dark Net: How Cryptomarkets are Transforming the Global Trade in Illicit Drug. Palgrave Pivot.  

  2. Martin, J. (2014). Lost on the Silk Road: Online drug distribution and the ‘cryptomarket’. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14(3). http://crj.sagepub.com/content/14/3/351.full.pdf+html.  

  3. #15A,  Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl St., New York, NY  

9 thoughts on “Ulbricht to be Sentenced Friday

  1. Sad to see Ross do what he needs to do at this point. I'm feeling the rage inside that Ross himself cannot express (at least not until he is free).

  2. The sort of shit these people write allow the court to write for them…

    Disgraceful. What ever happened to "abusing your temporal power will not make you better able to live with the scum that you are" or "you can not imprison a free man anymore than you can set yourselves free" or so on or so forth.

    This pretense that anyone's actually buying into USG "justice" is mindbogling.

  3. Moreover, he doesn't understand how courts work.

    A: "The trial court gave me life in prison, based on the testimony of criminals, for breaking certain laws which should not exist in a free society. I have no remorse, because I did nothing wrong."

    B: "I admitted that I was wrong and am remorseful for all the people I hurt, and the trial court showed me leniency by giving me a reduced sentence."

    By choosing A, he'd be keeping the issue political. The courts would jump at the chance to let him off on a technicality rather than make him into a martyr.

    But by admitting wrongdoing, and by getting leniency from the lower court, he's turning himself into a typical routine criminal. The appellate court will be quick to confirm and send him on his way to the iron bar hotel.

    Effectively, by writing that letter, he traded a chance at acquittal for a chance at a reduced sentence. Not even as good a deal as a plea bargain, if you ask me.

  4. Still some chance of a reversal if the appellate judge finds that RU was convicted based on tainted evidence. However, I can't believe that there's insufficient untainted evidence to convict him on at least some charges.

    It's a sad turn of events, however you look at it, for RU and his family. It's easy to make fun of his naive thinking, and eager repudiation of his beliefs. But I don't think I have the right to do that from the comfort of my armchair, when he's the one looking at these consequences, with one of the most effective US Attorney offices in the country pulling out all the stops against him.

      • Damned Socratic method. OK, I have the right to make fun of him, or anyone else on the Internet. But in RU's case, I would feel badly about it.

        • Think of it as sort of the converse (or contrapositive?) of the Good Samaritan parable. Common law in most jurisdictions that are influenced by the Anglo-Saxons dictates that a person in distress has no right to expect help from a passerby. I can walk over a bridge, and observing a drowning man, and laugh at him, without consequence.

          Conversely (or contrapositively?), RU might deserve praise for heroism if he consistently advocated for his beliefs, even in the face of a harsh punishment. But we have no expectation of such heroic behavior.

        • So would I, sure.

          He might not be the sharpest tool in the shed, but what difference does that make. Sucks to be him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>